Home » 2015 » December

Monthly Archives: December 2015

The wrong kind of Boxing Day

The rail network is mostly shut down for Boxing Day. “Most operators will be running no services on Boxing Day, with the rest running a reduced service”, says The Guardian, and Labour has pointed out the hypocrisy of the Tories on the subject (see the link below).

Well done, Labour, for making the most of this! And it is a serious issue. But I confess to having laughed a lot at some of the quotes here from Network Rail and the government: Mark Carne “acutely conscious” that passengers want to travel to see their families at Christmas. OK then, Mark, er, so, er — hello? Hello? Then there’s the rail minister saying she hoped that “any impacts to services are communicated to passengers”. What? While they’re stuck on a train stalled outside some closed station and reduced to breaking into their Christmas whisky for comfort?

But perhaps there’s good news on the horizon. Labour noticing this situation may mean that its old guard – the Blairites, the Brownites and the Gawd knows what-ites – have woken up to the need to attack the Tories, not their own leader. If so, and if Labour wins the next election, we will see the rail network publicly owned again and, this time (if I’ve read Jeremy right), publicly accountable. Now there’s a thought for comfort while you’re stuck on that train. Hands off my whisky!

Here’s the Guardian story:

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/dec/26/boxing-day-rail-shutdown-prompts-labour-accusation-of-tory-hypocrisy?utm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=GU+Today+main+NEW+H&utm_term=146229&subid=12991040&CMP=EMCNEWEML6619I2

John McDonnell at The Peoples Assembly Against Austerity

Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell talks about the new politics after Jeremy Corbyn’s election as leader of the Labour Party.

syzygysue's avatarThink Left

Targets should be to tackle homelessness, food banks, joblessness, withdrawal of social care, climate change not GDP which just measures how much wealth has moved to the top.

John McDonnell MP Shadow Chancellor The Peoples Assembly Against Austerity 05 12 15

View original post

“It’s not our war”

When a country goes to war, governments always back up their decision with high-flown rhetoric about defending this or standing up for that. They did it at the start of the First World War in 1914. When the shipbuilding workers of Govan on Clydeside went on strike in, I think, 1915 they were told they were “disloyal”, “unpatriotic”. The workers’ union replied that it was not their war. In his book The First Day on the Somme, Martin Middlebrook didn’t mention such resistance during those years, not just because his focus was on one day in a particular battle during that war, but also because he believed that “[t]he entire country, and beyond it, the Empire, entered wholeheartedly into the conflict.”[1] He did, however, recognise that the reality behind the war was not high-flown at all. He wrote:

“Britain’s stated war aim was to secure the neutrality of Belgium, but in reality she wished to curb the power of Germany, whom she regarded as a growing rival to her trade, maritime and imperial interests.”[2]

So the crime of the workers of Govan was really their disloyalty, not to some idea of “the nation” or to “King and Country” (both of which are routinely dressed up as noble causes) but to something even more questionable as objects of loyalty: Britain’s “trade, maritime and imperial interests”.

In the Foreword to his novel about the First World War, A Farewell to Arms, Ernest Hemingway makes a similar point, but with some anger:

“The title of the book is A Farewell to Arms and except for three years there has been war of some kind almost ever since it has been written … I am sure that I am prejudiced, and I hope that I am very prejudiced. But it is the considered belief of the writer of this book that wars are fought by the finest people that there are, or just say people, although the closer you are to where they are fighting, the finer people you meet; but they are made, provoked and initiated by straight economic rivalries and by swine that stand to profit from them. I believe that all the people who stand to profit by a war and who help provoke it should be shot on the first day it starts by accredited representatives of the loyal citizens of their country who will fight it.”

Moving on to the 21st century, it seems that the crime of those of us who support Stop the War is similar to that of the workers of Govan in 1915. So let’s keep saying, with them, “It’s not our war.”

 

 

 

 

[1] Middlebrook, M. (1984). The First Day on the Somme: 1 July 1916, Penguin Books, London, p. xv.

[2] Ibid.

Benediction in the Commons

Excellent. This cuts through Benn’s hypocrisy and blustering rhetoric

The Colossus's avatarThe Colossus

Hilary-Benn (2).jpg

As First Lady, Hillary Rodham Clinton ‘urged’ her husband to bomb Serbia. As the Democratic Senator from New York, she voted for and vocally supported the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. As Secretary of State, she zealously oversaw the bombardment and destruction of Libya. Mrs Clinton’s lucrative and long-standing connections to so-called ‘defence contractors’ are no longer a secret, and, true to form, she is now calling for a ground war in Syria. In spite of all this and more, her impending presidency is sending liberals everywhere into fits of glossolalist rapture.

Last Wednesday, we in Britain were reminded that we have a hawkish Hilary of our very own. Towards the end of a parliamentary debate on bombing Syria, the shadow foreign secretary delivered a theatric speech in which he euphemistically enjoined the House of Commons to ‘do [its] bit’ in a land which is already being ravaged by the…

View original post 1,639 more words